From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45446 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAqir-0005UH-PO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:06:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1PAqXX-0000io-RY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:54:41 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:55655)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1PAqXX-0000id-Fb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:54:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4CC73FFC.8070709@mail.berlios.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:54:20 +0200
From: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <86sjzssydf.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>	<4CC715B7.6090100@mail.berlios.de>
	<86mxq022fm.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>	<4CC72D80.3000606@redhat.com>
	<86eibc1zvk.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
In-Reply-To: <86eibc1zvk.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Torbjorn Granlund <tg@gmplib.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 26.10.2010 22:07, schrieb Torbjorn Granlund:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 10/26/2010 09:12 PM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> > FreeBSD 8.1-p1 x86_64 (the CPU is AMD Phenom X6).
> >
> > I use the kqemu kernel module. All software (kernel, /usr/ports) are
> > up-to-date as of yesterday.
>
> I suggest that you use a newer version, even though kqemu support has
> been removed there.
>
> Newer version of what? FreeBSD 8.1-RELENG updated yesterday, and a
> ports tree from yesterday, are new in my world!
>
> Or do you mean to use FreeBSD CURRENT? That's not an alternative for
> me, I am running on production machines. (And if kqemu is gone, that's
> not an improvement...)
>

No, you need newer version of qemu, for example version 0.13.0
(see http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page) or latest qemu version
from the qemu git repository.

kqemu was replaced by kvm support (at least for some platforms).

As far as I know, there should be kvm support for FreeBSD, too,
but I must admit that I rarely use kvm: for most guests
which you listed neither kqemu nor kvm will be useable.
Both only improve host architecture = guest architecture
scenarios.