From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38084 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAqmO-0001sT-9J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:10:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PAqmN-0003yY-3M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:10:00 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:49451)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PAqmM-0003yQ-RE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:09:59 -0400
Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so4585738bwz.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CC743A2.90807@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:09:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <86sjzssydf.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>	<4CC715B7.6090100@mail.berlios.de>
	<86mxq022fm.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>	<4CC72D80.3000606@redhat.com>
	<86eibc1zvk.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
In-Reply-To: <86eibc1zvk.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Torbjorn Granlund <tg@gmplib.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 10/26/2010 10:07 PM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
>    On 10/26/2010 09:12 PM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
>    >  FreeBSD 8.1-p1 x86_64 (the CPU is AMD Phenom X6).
>    >
>    >  I use the kqemu kernel module.  All software (kernel, /usr/ports) are
>    >  up-to-date as of yesterday.
>
>    I suggest that you use a newer version, even though kqemu support has
>    been removed there.
>
> Newer version of what?  FreeBSD 8.1-RELENG updated yesterday, and a
> ports tree from yesterday, are new in my world!
>
> Or do you mean to use FreeBSD CURRENT?  That's not an alternative for
> me, I am running on production machines.  (And if kqemu is gone, that's
> not an improvement...)

I meant of QEMU.  I thought it was an old version because of the kqemu 
reference.  However, if you're using 0.13.0 as you wrote to Alex, then 
you're actually not using kqemu.

Paolo