From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33648 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PB2Ur-00021c-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:40:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PB2M7-0004rZ-7V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:31:58 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:52632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PB2M7-0004rP-4v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:31:39 -0400 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so565049qyk.4 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4CC7F176.9080909@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:31:34 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <86sjzssydf.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <8642FB76-3D0B-4326-9C8B-B7ED8802B761@suse.de> <86r5fc22wx.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <86iq0o20lh.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <8662wo112y.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <55EA6A25-A935-4FFE-A610-D40E9E6F787A@suse.de> <861v7c0z4j.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> In-Reply-To: <861v7c0z4j.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Torbjorn Granlund Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-devel Developers On 10/27/2010 11:21 AM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: > You might have different goals than me. Speed is nice, and sometimes > critically important. But for my project to get (pseudo) access to lots > of more hardware for GNU software testing purposes, speed is not a major > issue. Stability, robustness, reproducibility, documentation, are > critically important to me. Lobbying a Debian developer into giving access to Debian porter machines is probably even more effective than KVM. Paolo