From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] add VMSTATE_BOOL
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:28:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD94C85.9060008@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101109130530.GD22705@redhat.com>
On 11/09/10 14:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:50:11PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>>>>> +static int get_bool(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + bool *v = pv;
>>>>>> + *v = qemu_get_byte(f);
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>
>>> I think we should verify that value is 0 or 1 and fail
>>> migration otherwise, to make it more robust.
>>
>> I still think such a check doesn't belong into the migration code as
>> such a bug would exist without migration too. And if anything we
>> should check on save not on load, otherwise qemu can write out
>> savevm images which it will refuse to load. I wouldn't call this
>> "robust".
>>
>> cheers,
>> Gerd
>
> I think we should verify on load: e.g. the image could have
> got corrupted.
For catching corruption checksums work much better.
> What, exactly, do you want to check on save?
I don't want to check anything.
I'm just saying that *if* we are sanity-checking bool to catch bugs it
is much more useful to do that when saving.
> savevm: validate bool values on load
>
> We always save 0 or 1 values for booleans. Validate on input to
> increase the chance of detecting input corruption.
NACK.
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-01 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add VMSTATE_BOOL Gerd Hoffmann
2010-11-01 15:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " malc
2010-11-08 17:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-09 9:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-11-09 9:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-11-09 9:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-11-09 11:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-09 11:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-11-09 13:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-09 13:28 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2010-11-09 13:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD94C85.9060008@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).