From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49266 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGUHp-0006qo-Tj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:21:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1PGUHo-0003Wu-Ug
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:21:45 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5229)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1PGUHo-0003Wp-O6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:21:44 -0500
Message-ID: <4CDBC3B3.8040007@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:21:39 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1289409261-5418-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1289409261-5418-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv3 00/14] boot order specification
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com

On 11/10/10 18:14, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment on.
> I am using open firmware naming scheme to specify device path names.
>
> Names look like this on pci machine:
> /pci@i0cf8/ide@1,1/drive@1/disk@0
> /pci@i0cf8/isa@1/fdc@03f1/floppy@1
> /pci@i0cf8/isa@1/fdc@03f1/floppy@0
> /pci@i0cf8/ide@1,1/drive@1/disk@1
> /pci@i0cf8/ide@1,1/drive@0/disk@0
> /pci@i0cf8/scsi@3/disk@0
> /pci@i0cf8/ethernet@4/ethernet-phy@0
> /pci@i0cf8/ethernet@5/ethernet-phy@0
> /pci@i0cf8/ide@1,1/drive@0/disk@1
> /pci@i0cf8/isa@1/ide@01e8/drive@0/disk@0
> /pci@i0cf8/usb@1,2/network@0/ethernet@0
> /pci@i0cf8/usb@1,2/hub@1/network@0/ethernet@0

Good stuff overall, but see replies to patches for some nits.

IIRC some powerpc (+sparc?) boards pass a device tree to the guest.  So 
with this (and maybe some more bits) we might be able to dynamically 
generate a device tree from our qdev tree?  Any comments from the 
ppc/sparc folks on this?

cheers,
   Gerd