From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefan.hajnoczi@uk.ibm.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] v8 Decouple block device removal from device removal
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDD7BB1.5060504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289581634-21177-1-git-send-email-ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Am 12.11.2010 18:07, schrieb Ryan Harper:
> details, details, v8
>
> This patch series decouples the detachment of a block device from the
> removal of the backing pci-device. Removal of a hotplugged pci device
> requires the guest to respond before qemu tears down the block device.
> In some cases, the guest may not respond leaving the guest with
> continued access to the block device. Mgmt layer doesn't have a
> reliable method to force a disconnect.
>
> The new monitor command, drive_del, will revoke a guests access to the
> block device independently of the removal of the pci device.
>
> The first patch implements drive_del, the second patch implements the
> qmp version of the monitor command.
>
> Changes since v7:
> - Fixed up doc strings (delete -> drive_del)
> Changes since v6:
> - Updated patch description
> - Dropped bdrv_unplug and inlined in drive_del
> - Explicitly invoke drive_uninit()
> Changes since v5:
> - Removed dangling pointers in guest and host state. This ensures things like
> info block no longer displays the deleted drive; though info pci will
> continue to display the pci device until the guest responds to the removal
> request.
> - Renamed drive_unplug -> drive_del
> Changes since v4:
> - Droppped drive_get_by_id patch and use bdrv_find() instead
> - Added additional details about drive_unplug to hmp/qmp interface
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Moved QMP command for drive_unplug() to separate patch
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Added QMP command for drive_unplug()
>
> Changes since v1:
> - CodingStyle fixes
> - Added qemu_aio_flush() to bdrv_unplug()
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Thanks, applied both to the block branch.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 17:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] v8 Decouple block device removal from device removal Ryan Harper
2010-11-12 17:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Implement drive_del to decouple block " Ryan Harper
2010-11-12 17:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Add qmp version of drive_del Ryan Harper
2010-11-12 17:38 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2010-11-16 13:51 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] v8 Decouple block device removal from device removal Luiz Capitulino
2010-11-16 14:01 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-11-16 14:36 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-11-16 14:58 ` Ryan Harper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDD7BB1.5060504@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stefan.hajnoczi@uk.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).