From: Bernhard Kohl <bernhard.kohl@nsn.com>
To: "ext Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH comment tweaked] msix: allow byte and word reading from mmio
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:12:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE3FEDC.6040601@nsn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117141236.GA14949@redhat.com>
Am 17.11.2010 15:12, schrieb ext Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Bernhard Kohl wrote:
>
>> Am 16.11.2010 14:14, schrieb mst@redhat.com:
>>
>>> Although explicitly disallowed by the PCI spec, some guests read a
>>> single byte or word from mmio. Likely a guest OS bug, but I have an OS
>>> which reads single bytes and it works fine on real hardware.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kohl<bernhard.kohl@nsn.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> OK so it could like something like the below.
>>>
>> Yes, this looks good for me.
>>
> Wait, the below shows single-word reads. I thought you said bytes?
>
The original patch was several month old. When posting it
I added some more description text. Sorry, I mismatched
words with bytes. In fact there are only these word accesses
as seen below.
>
>>> However, my question is:
>>> do we need to put this in or can the guest simply be fixed?
>>>
>> I tried to locate the code where the readw occurs,
>> but not successful. It only occurs during booting our OS,
>> and the virtio-net driver seems to be OK. With 4 virtio
>> NICs we have the following readw accesses, thats all!
>> 3 accesses per NIC and the first NIC appears twice.
>>
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000008
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000018
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000028
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9772c40 addr=0000000000000008
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9772c40 addr=0000000000000018
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9772c40 addr=0000000000000028
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x977dc38 addr=0000000000000008
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x977dc38 addr=0000000000000018
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x977dc38 addr=0000000000000028
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9788d90 addr=0000000000000008
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9788d90 addr=0000000000000018
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9788d90 addr=0000000000000028
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000008
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000018
>> MSI-X: msix_mmio_readw dev=0x9767c58 addr=0000000000000028
>>
> Hmm, message data is being read for some reason.
>
Yes there is a helper library in our OS which does the
following (the MOVZX does 16-bit mem read):
*int_level_ptr = (byte) msi_x_table_ptr->message_data;
; STATEMENT # 2593
00001FC0 640FB74008 MOVZX EAX,FS:[EAX]+8H
@29:
00001FC5 0FB44D10 LFS ECX,[EBP].int_level_ptr
00001FC9 648801 MOV FS:[ECX],AL
>
>> Is it possible to add a stack back tace printing to the
>> readw function?
>>
> There's the qemu -S option, it will let you debug the guest.
> Still, question is, do we need work-around in qemu,
> because a broken guest is in production and can not be fixed,
> or can guest just be fixed?
>
I will fix the guest and inform you after testing.
Then we can skip this patch.
>
>>> hw/msix.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
>>> index f66d255..38dff59 100644
>>> --- a/hw/msix.c
>>> +++ b/hw/msix.c
>>> @@ -102,10 +102,28 @@ static uint32_t msix_mmio_readl(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>>> return pci_get_long(page + offset);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static uint32_t msix_mmio_read_unallowed(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>>> + /* Note:
>>> + * PCI spec requires that all MSI-X table accesses are either DWORD or QWORD,
>>> + * size aligned. Some guests seem to violate this rule for read accesses,
>>> + * performing single byte reads. Since it's easy to support this, let's do so.
>>> + * Also support 16 bit size aligned reads, just in case.
>>> + */
>>> +static uint32_t msix_mmio_readw(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>>> {
>>> - fprintf(stderr, "MSI-X: only dword read is allowed!\n");
>>> - return 0;
>>> + PCIDevice *dev = opaque;
>>> + unsigned int offset = addr& (MSIX_PAGE_SIZE - 1)& ~0x1;
>>> + void *page = dev->msix_table_page;
>>> +
>>> + return pci_get_word(page + offset);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static uint32_t msix_mmio_readb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>>> +{
>>> + PCIDevice *dev = opaque;
>>> + unsigned int offset = addr& (MSIX_PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>>> + void *page = dev->msix_table_page;
>>> +
>>> + return pci_get_byte(page + offset);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static uint8_t msix_pending_mask(int vector)
>>> @@ -192,6 +210,11 @@ static void msix_mmio_writel(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
>>> msix_handle_mask_update(dev, vector);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* PCI spec:
>>> + * For all accesses to MSI-X Table and MSI-X PBA fields, software must use
>>> + * aligned full DWORD or aligned full QWORD transactions; otherwise, the result
>>> + * is undefined.
>>> + */
>>> static void msix_mmio_write_unallowed(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
>>> uint32_t val)
>>> {
>>> @@ -203,7 +226,7 @@ static CPUWriteMemoryFunc * const msix_mmio_write[] = {
>>> };
>>>
>>> static CPUReadMemoryFunc * const msix_mmio_read[] = {
>>> - msix_mmio_read_unallowed, msix_mmio_read_unallowed, msix_mmio_readl
>>> + msix_mmio_readb, msix_mmio_readw, msix_mmio_readl
>>> };
>>>
>>> /* Should be called from device's map method. */
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH comment tweaked] msix: allow byte and word reading from mmio mst
2010-11-16 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Bernhard Kohl
2010-11-17 14:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-17 16:12 ` Bernhard Kohl [this message]
2010-11-17 16:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-24 14:35 ` Bernhard Kohl
2010-11-17 14:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE3FEDC.6040601@nsn.com \
--to=bernhard.kohl@nsn.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).