From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58239 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKg4F-0007pD-9b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:45:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKg46-0008UG-7c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:45:03 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:60762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKg46-0008Th-2T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:44:54 -0500 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAMNdGqI004759 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:39:16 -0700 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oAMNiq2T136024 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:44:52 -0700 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oAMNmxI8025677 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:48:59 -0700 Message-ID: <4CEB006C.8010407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:44:44 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1290466818-5230-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20101122230405.GB10050@sequoia.sous-sol.org> In-Reply-To: <20101122230405.GB10050@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: introduce cpu_start/cpu_stop commands List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Chris Wright Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 11/22/2010 05:04 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > * Anthony Liguori (aliguori@us.ibm.com) wrote: > >> qemu-kvm vcpu threads don't response to SIGSTOP/SIGCONT. Instead of teaching >> them to respond to these signals, introduce monitor commands that stop and start >> individual vcpus. >> > In the past SIGSTOP has introduced time skew. Have you verified this > isn't an issue. > Time skew is a big topic. Are you talking about TSC drift, pit/rtc/hpet drift, etc? It's certainly going to stress periodic interrupt catch up code. Regards, Anthony Liguori > thanks, > -chris >