From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39235 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLXXB-0000CM-Jm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:50:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1PLXX7-0001iF-8F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:50:29 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34733)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1PLXX7-0001i2-1N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:50:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4CEE2343.3090505@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:50:11 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] scsi-generic: bugfixes for 'SCSIRequest'
	conversion
References: <1290586723-8724-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org>	
	<4CECD36E.50401@suse.de> <4CECD50F.9060501@redhat.com>	
	<4CECE609.7080600@suse.de> <4CECEA2A.40008@redhat.com>	
	<4CECED12.5020109@suse.de> <1290674774.32570.106.camel@pasglop>
In-Reply-To: <1290674774.32570.106.camel@pasglop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com

On 11/25/10 09:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> So far tho, it appears that I can (at least with scsi-disk) rely on
> always been eventually called with SCSI_REASON_DONE so my code (and
> maybe the usb-msd code too, I haven't verified) relies on that to
> complete requests... Is that incorrect ?

Yes.

cheers,
   Gerd