From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35537 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMRp0-0003gb-FM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:56:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1PMRoz-0005d1-69
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:56:38 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60707)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1PMRoy-0005cu-To
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:56:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4CF1706A.3000507@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:56:10 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1290012243-6087-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<20101123153141.GD25606@redhat.com>
	<4CEBE7F4.9080200@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CEBE7F4.9080200@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, mst@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net

On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> Anthony, Blue
>>
>> No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
>
> Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to 
> review it?
>
> IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
>

I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get it 
right.

But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.