From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39693 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMdio-0007y1-KF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:39:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1PMdin-0005JB-9r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:39:02 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4298)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1PMdim-0005J7-Qr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:39:01 -0500
Message-ID: <4CF2231C.5000706@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:38:36 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1290012243-6087-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	<20101123153141.GD25606@redhat.com>
	<4CEBE7F4.9080200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4CF1706A.3000507@redhat.com>
	<20101128075404.GF6897@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101128075404.GF6897@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net

On 11/28/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >  >On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >  >>Anthony, Blue
> >  >>
> >  >>No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
> >  >
> >  >Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
> >  >review it?
> >  >
> >  >IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
> >  >
> >
> >  I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get
> >  it right.
> >
> >  But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed?
> >
>
> The patch creates Openfirmware device path from qdev
> hierarchy. Each element of a device path depends on type of a bus
> the device resides on. You can find various bus bindings here:
> http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/ and main spec is here
> http://forthworks.com/standards/of1275.pdf. Format in which list of
> device paths is passed to firmware is documented by comment (it is very
> simple). The only thing missing is command line option documentation. I
> will add it and resend if no more changes are needed for patch to be
> excepted.

What about the format of the fwcfg interface?  It should be described, 
and point to the references above.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function