From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41295 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMzZI-00054c-Gr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:58:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMzZH-0002c7-DW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:58:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMzZH-0002c1-5X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:58:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF36B79.4000008@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:59:37 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20101117214223.GA31321@sir.home> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] ceph/rbd block driver for qemu-kvm (v8) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Christian Brunner , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Am 27.11.2010 08:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Christian Brunner > wrote: >> Thanks for the review. What am I supposed to do now? > > Kevin is the block maintainer. His review is the next step, I have > CCed him. After that rbd would be ready to merge. If I don't find anything really obvious and it doesn't break the build, I'll merge it based on your review. Kevin