From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36665 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PN0QI-0000lm-AT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:53:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PN0QH-0007fs-8o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:53:26 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PN0QG-0007ff-VX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:53:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF3780B.1070904@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:53:15 +0100 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] CFP: 1st International QEMU Users Forum References: <30B7D3FB-2015-46CC-9FE6-C4C593A85F6C@suse.de> <4CEE3ADF.3090509@acm.org> <123AFFD7-4D89-4A45-B068-634710329383@suse.de> <4CEF681C.8050504@redhat.com> <9C4CB461-0627-4D16-9666-307963A5872C@suse.de> <4CEFA838.6080600@redhat.com> <4CEFC085.9080603@codemonkey.ws> <4CEFC0E8.5060306@redhat.com> <4CEFC264.3020807@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Chris Wright , Peter Maydell , wolfgang mueller , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?rot?= , QEMU-devel Developers , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_P=E9t?=@gnu.org On 11/26/10 16:19, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 26.11.2010, at 16:10, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 26 November 2010 14:21, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> But the key point is breadth, it should not be a "KVM Forum" but rather an >>> Open Virtualization conference with topics as high level as cloud software >>> automation and as low level as asynchronous page faults :-) >> >> Does that breadth include the emulation/TCG side of qemu or only >> the virtualisation/KVM side? I'm never quite sure with titles that >> just say "Virtualization"... > > Historically, virtualization gatherings have been fairly non-tcg friendly. I don't see why we'd have to continue that trend though. A lot of the code actually affects both sides. IMHO it would be good to have focus on broader QEMU collaboration, including TCG. Cheers, Jes