From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55576 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQFSn-0000h4-0k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:33:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1PQFSl-0006Fy-FV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:33:24 -0500
Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:34986)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1PQFSl-0006FQ-4c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:33:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4CFF4280.30702@web.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:32:00 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] State of EHCI emulation for QEMU
References: <4CDEE6C5.3010808@web.de> <4CF988EC.6010004@redhat.com>
	<4CFA0462.8080407@web.de> <4CFAA2D9.3010106@cisco.com>
	<4CFF4142.2090603@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CFF4142.2090603@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enigF9C868D38F9FF44466F166C1"
Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "David S. Ahern" <daahern@cisco.com>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigF9C868D38F9FF44466F166C1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 08.12.2010 09:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
>=20
>> It appears that the import of the ehci code to spice has completely lo=
st
>> the development history and code contributions - from the original
>> version by Mark Burkley through the work I've done on it. Would you mi=
nd
>> pulling in the patch history instead of just the final code?
>=20
> I've first tried to rebase the ehci branch to latest master exactly to
> keep the history.  Was quite messy with lots of conflicts though, so I
> gave up.  For review & upstream merge having the whole history isn't
> that helpful anyway.

I'm was regularly merging master into ehci, and that worked quite well.
For the development phase, it might be nice to keep the history if
possible. But I agree that we need a clean series once upstream
submission is in sight.

Jan


--------------enigF9C868D38F9FF44466F166C1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkz/QoAACgkQitSsb3rl5xRwcACfZjA822cX6iJEoJmJMxaz2byo
OXoAnAke3knPCfb14kR0PYiY2Fj1U/ox
=9/22
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigF9C868D38F9FF44466F166C1--