From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50302 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQOfi-0007Mz-5H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:23:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PQOfg-0004Xc-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:23:22 -0500 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:54872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PQOfg-0004XA-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:23:20 -0500 Received: from d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.85]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oB8I5W6O023220 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:05:42 -0500 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33DC4DE8047 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:21:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oB8INGLo120846 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:23:16 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oB8INFlp001133 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:23:15 -0200 Message-ID: <4CFFCD10.6060500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20101208160110.1b0c7c64@doriath> In-Reply-To: <20101208160110.1b0c7c64@doriath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault with ram_size > 4095M without kvm List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: ryanh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aurelien@aurel32.net On 12/08/2010 12:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use> 4095M memsize. > This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on > 32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're > not using kvm > > Upstream qemu-kvm is affected if using the -no-kvm option; this patch address > the segfault there as well. > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno > --- > NOTE: this patch was applied in the v0.12.x branch, but it seems it got > lost for master > No, it was intentional. We should fix the segv, this is not a known limitation but rather a bug. Regards, Anthony Liguori > vl.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c > index 2dbb6db..bb9c21c 100644 > --- a/vl.c > +++ b/vl.c > @@ -5792,6 +5792,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) > fprintf(stderr, "failed to initialize KVM\n"); > exit(1); > } > + } else { > + /* without kvm enabled, we can only support 4095 MB RAM */ > + if (ram_size> (4095UL<< 20)) { > + fprintf(stderr, "qemu: without kvm support at most 4095 MB RAM can be simulated\n"); > + exit(1); > + } > } > > if (qemu_init_main_loop()) { >