From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42240 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PSnuZ-00069d-Qi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:44:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1PSnuY-00005C-Jz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:44:39 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40255)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1PSnuY-00004r-C2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:44:38 -0500
Message-ID: <4D088DE8.1050107@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:44:08 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1292286883-20157-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
	<4D079B28.2000102@redhat.com>
	<6B496D29-D39F-463E-9E0C-4E84245111A3@suse.de>
	<4D087C17.3040401@redhat.com>
	<1E6E767A-9B7D-4605-B556-501C87BA29FB@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <1E6E767A-9B7D-4605-B556-501C87BA29FB@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/11] AHCI emulation support v9
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>, QEMU-devel Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>, Roland Elek <elek.roland@gmail.com>, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>

   Hi,

> Even better! Could we get that in for 0.14 still? I assume that means
> we need a stable seabios release.

Also for Gleb's bootorder bits we'll need a seabios update.  I think for 
that not all bits are in upstream seabios yet though.  A new release 
once this is settled is probably a good idea, so we don't have to grab a 
random snapshot.

cheers,
   Gerd