From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57190 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PT8zg-0000bG-08 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:15:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT8ze-0007eJ-7Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:15:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PT8zd-0007eB-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:15:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4D09CA91.9020506@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:15:13 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D0234D9.7040806@redhat.com> <4D0601CF.6080007@redhat.com> <4D08B17E.90100@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4D08B17E.90100@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Spice-devel] RFC; usb redirection protocol List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hans de Goede Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > It could be that the implementation decides to not handle synchroneous > commands synchroneous at all. The main difference I'm trying to make > here is between commands which do things to end points which cannot > be done while other packets are in flight (like setting configuration, > or interface alt setting) and commands (normal packets) of which there > can be multiple in flight. I'm open to using a different term then > synchroneous and async here. Name them control / data packets? cheers, Gerd