From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44995 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTbj5-00016i-0T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:56:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTbj3-0005xJ-Qc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:56:06 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:46362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTbj3-0005xD-FW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:56:05 -0500 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBHEpJCm004520 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:51:19 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id oBHEtvYV262290 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:55:57 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oBHEtvtp013344 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:55:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4D0B7A02.3070202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:56:02 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] qdev: reset qdev along with qdev tree References: <32f3c5f99628967649cf6987dbf9c4c2c4baa568.1290160397.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp> <4D0A6909.2090404@mail.berlios.de> <20101216234804.GG3878@redhat.com> <4D0AADCB.4010301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Isaku Yamahata , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 12/17/2010 08:45 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 December 2010 00:24, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 05:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >>> Ugh, I keep forgetting about the non-qdev systems. >>> Maybe it's a good way to finally make everyone to convert? If a system >>> maintainer can't be bothered to convert to qdev we can declare the >>> system unsupported :) >>> > >> Honestly, I think that's a fair thing to do. >> > I'm guessing that would be a transition/conversion to make for the > 0.15 release, right? > Yes. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- PMM >