From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42334 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PcHRf-00027z-3u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:06:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PcHRd-0004mR-PP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:05:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PcHRd-0004kg-Ig for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:05:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4D2B0431.1090701@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:05:53 +0100 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 11 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel On 01/10/11 12:59, Juan Quintela wrote: > Juan Quintela wrote: > > Now sent it to the right kvm list. Sorry for the second sent. > >> Please send any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> >> - KVM Forum 2011 (Jes). Just to add a bit more background. Last year we discussed the issue of whether to aim for a KVM Forum in the same style as we had in 2010, or whether to try to aim for a broader multi-track Virtualization conference that covers the whole stack. Linux Foundation is happy to help host such an event, but they are asking for what our plans are. I posted a mock-proposal for tracks here: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KVM_Forum_2011 Cheers, Jes