From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55632 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdqZl-0001kP-Fs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:48:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdqZj-0004Aa-JS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:48:48 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:34479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdqZj-0004AW-HB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:48:47 -0500 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1140096vws.4 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:48:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D30B6A8.6020603@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:48:40 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] paravirtual tablet v3 References: <4D307B69.1030801@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4D307B69.1030801@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: spice-devel , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 01/14/2011 10:35 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > Now v3 featuring multitouch ;) > > cheers, > Gerd I really think multitouch needs to be a feature such that the guest can nack it and the host can adjust accordingly. If it's there from day 1, that's fine, but it still should be a feature. There are a lot of non-multitouch aware guests out there and I don't think we want the driver to be the one deciding how to map a multitouch device to something that doesn't support mulitouch. Regards, Anthony Liguori