From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41213 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PekZ4-0004RA-Cr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:35:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PekJT-0008C6-F4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:19:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PekJT-0008Br-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:19:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4D33FB99.6080207@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:19:37 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] paravirtual tablet v3 References: <4D307B69.1030801@redhat.com> <4D30B6A8.6020603@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4D30B6A8.6020603@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: spice-devel , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 01/14/11 21:48, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/14/2011 10:35 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Now v3 featuring multitouch ;) >> >> cheers, >> Gerd > > I really think multitouch needs to be a feature such that the guest can > nack it and the host can adjust accordingly. If it's there from day 1, > that's fine, but it still should be a feature. > > There are a lot of non-multitouch aware guests out there and I don't > think we want the driver to be the one deciding how to map a multitouch > device to something that doesn't support mulitouch. Sure, someone needs to map multitouch to non-multitouch. I'd leave that job to the guest driver tough. Why do you think doing it in the host is better? cheers, Gerd