From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: MIPS, io-thread, icount and wfi
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:00:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3564D9.6020104@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110118001950.GA11802@laped.lan>
On 2011-01-18 01:19, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:03:08AM +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running an io-thread enabled qemu-system-mipsel with icount.
>> When the guest (linux) goes to sleep through the wait insn (waiting
>> to be woken up by future timer interrupts), the thing deadlocks.
>>
>> IIUC, this is because vm timers are driven by icount, but the CPU is
>> halted so icount makes no progress and time stands still.
>>
>> I've locally disabled vcpu halting when icount is enabled, that
>> works around my problem but of course makes qemu consume 100% host cpu.
>>
>> I don't know why I only see this problem with io-thread builds?
>> Could be related timing and luck.
>>
>> Would be interesting to know if someone has any info on how this was
>> intended to work (if it was)? And if there are ideas for better
>> workarounds or fixes that don't disable vcpu halting entirely.
>
> Hi,
>
> I've found the problem. For some reason io-thread builds use a
> static timeout for wait loops. The entire chunk of code that
> makes sure qemu_icount makes forward progress when the CPU's
> are idle has been ifdef'ed away...
>
> This fixes the problem for me, hopefully without affecting
> io-thread runs without icount.
>
> commit 0f4f3a919952500b487b438c5520f07a1c6be35b
> Author: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar@axis.com>
> Date: Tue Jan 18 01:01:57 2011 +0100
>
> qemu-timer: Fix timeout calc for io-thread with icount
>
> Make sure we always make forward progress with qemu_icount to
> avoid deadlocks. For io-thread, use the static 1000 timeout
> only if icount is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar@axis.com>
>
> diff --git a/qemu-timer.c b/qemu-timer.c
> index 95814af..db1ec49 100644
> --- a/qemu-timer.c
> +++ b/qemu-timer.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static int64_t cpu_get_clock(void)
> }
> }
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_IOTHREAD
> static int64_t qemu_icount_delta(void)
> {
> if (!use_icount) {
> @@ -124,7 +123,6 @@ static int64_t qemu_icount_delta(void)
> return cpu_get_icount() - cpu_get_clock();
> }
> }
> -#endif
>
> /* enable cpu_get_ticks() */
> void cpu_enable_ticks(void)
> @@ -1077,9 +1075,17 @@ void quit_timers(void)
>
> int qemu_calculate_timeout(void)
> {
> -#ifndef CONFIG_IOTHREAD
> int timeout;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IOTHREAD
> + /* When using icount, making forward progress with qemu_icount when the
> + guest CPU is idle is critical. We only use the static io-thread timeout
> + for non icount runs. */
> + if (!use_icount) {
> + return 1000;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (!vm_running)
> timeout = 5000;
> else {
> @@ -1110,8 +1116,5 @@ int qemu_calculate_timeout(void)
> }
>
> return timeout;
> -#else /* CONFIG_IOTHREAD */
> - return 1000;
> -#endif
> }
>
>
>
This logic and timeout values were imported on iothread merge. And I bet
at least the timeout value of 1s (vs. 5s) can still be found in
qemu-kvm. Maybe someone over there can remember the rationales behind
choosing this value.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 10:03 [Qemu-devel] MIPS, io-thread, icount and wfi Edgar E. Iglesias
2011-01-18 0:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Edgar E. Iglesias
2011-01-18 10:00 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-01-18 10:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-19 17:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-19 19:02 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2011-01-23 4:09 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D3564D9.6020104@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).