From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44356 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfBtQ-0002mp-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:46:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfBtM-0007fD-Ra for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:46:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfBtM-0007et-K2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:46:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4D3599B6.5050002@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:46:30 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] paravirtual tablet v3 References: <4D307B69.1030801@redhat.com> <4D30B6A8.6020603@codemonkey.ws> <4D33FB99.6080207@redhat.com> <4D345A1F.6000607@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4D345A1F.6000607@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: spice-devel , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Hi, >> Sure, someone needs to map multitouch to non-multitouch. I'd leave >> that job to the guest driver tough. Why do you think doing it in the >> host is better? > > My assumptions are 1) the host is capable of doing the mapping just as > easily as the guest Probably. > 2) the host can do something useful with the > information that the guest is not multitouch capable. What do you think of here? cheers, Gerd