From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52928 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfFFT-0006xL-D8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfEv8-0002XV-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:02:56 -0500 Received: from eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.141]:50286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfEv8-0002X9-HU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:00:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4D35C728.5080607@st.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:00:24 +0100 From: Christophe Lyon MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Fix garbage collection of temporaries in Neon emulation. References: <4D35A4FB.3030403@st.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 18.01.2011 16:36, Peter Maydell wrote: > Incidentally there are some correctness fixes for the multiply-by-scalar > neon insns from the qemu-meego tree which are on my list to push > upstream. So you probably aren't getting the right results even if > you've managed to shut up qemu's warnings :-) > Actually it did not only shut up qemu's warnings. It was asserting. After fixing the asserts, it did warn a lot about resource leakage indeed, which I tried to fix with this patch. And yes I can confirm there are many other wrong results in the Neon support, which I am currently fixing. Christophe.