From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51637 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfcYI-0001fS-U0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:14:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1PfcYH-0001NL-VX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:14:38 -0500
Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:34661)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1PfcYH-0001My-KV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:14:37 -0500
Received: by qwk4 with SMTP id 4so1187537qwk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:14:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D372A07.7010806@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:14:31 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110119181123.GB13388@playa.tlv.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110119181123.GB13388@playa.tlv.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: libcacard as a git submodule
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> Any objections?
>    

My primary concern is that it is easy to make changes to QEMU that 
impact the interface between QEMU and libcacard so I'd actually prefer 
it not be a submodule.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Alon
>