From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost: force vhost off for non-MSI guests
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:37:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D399A44.5060405@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110121094827.GA26070@redhat.com>
On 01/21/2011 03:48 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:23:36PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 01/20/2011 10:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:43:57AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/20/2011 09:35 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When MSI is off, each interrupt needs to be bounced through the io
>>>>> thread when it's set/cleared, so vhost-net causes more context switches and
>>>>> higher CPU utilization than userspace virtio which handles networking in
>>>>> the same thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll need to fix this by adding level irq support in kvm irqfd,
>>>>> for now disable vhost-net in these configurations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>> I actually think this should be a terminal error. The user asks for
>>>> vhost-net, if we cannot enable it, we should exit.
>>>>
>>>> Or we should warn the user that they should expect bad performance.
>>>> Silently doing something that the user has explicitly asked us not
>>>> to do is not a good behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Anthony Liguori
>>>>
>>> The issue is that user has no control of the guest, and can not know
>>> whether the guest enables MSI. So what you ask for will just make
>>> some guests fail, and others fail sometimes.
>>> The user also has no way to know that version X of kvm does not expose a
>>> way to inject level interrupts with irqfd.
>>>
>>> We could have *another* flag that says "use vhost where it helps" but
>>> then I think this is what everyone wants to do, anyway, and libvirt
>>> already sets vhost=on so I prefer redefining the meaning of an existing
>>> flag.
>>>
>> In the very least, there needs to be a vhost=force.
>> Having some sort of friendly default policy is fine but we need to
>> provide a mechanism for a user to have the final say. If you want
>> to redefine vhost=on to really mean, use the friendly default,
>> that's fine by me, but only if the vhost=force option exists.
>>
> OK, I will add that, probably as a separate flag as vhost
> is a boolean. This will get worse performance but it will be what the
> user asked for.
>
>
>> I actually would think libvirt would want to use vhost=force.
>> Debugging with vhost=on is going to be a royal pain in the ass if a
>> user reports bad performance. Given the libvirt XML, you can't
>> actually tell from the guest and the XML whether or not vhost was
>> actually in use or not.
>>
> Yes you can: check MSI enabled in the guest, if it is -
> check vhost enabled in the XML. Not that bad at all, is it?
>
Until you automatically detect level triggered interrupt support for
irqfd. This means it's also dependent on a kernel feature too.
Is there any way to tell in QEMU that vhost was silently disabled?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anthony Liguori
>>
> We get worse performance without MSI anyway, how is this different?
>
>
>>> Maybe this is best handled by a documentation update?
>>>
>>> We always said:
>>> " use vhost=on to enable experimental in kernel accelerator\n"
>>>
>>> note 'enable' not 'require'. This is similar to how we specify
>>> nvectors : you can not make guest use the feature.
>>>
>>> How about this:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
>>> index 898561d..3c937c1 100644
>>> --- a/qemu-options.hx
>>> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
>>> @@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ DEF("net", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_net,
>>> " use vnet_hdr=off to avoid enabling the IFF_VNET_HDR tap flag\n"
>>> " use vnet_hdr=on to make the lack of IFF_VNET_HDR support an error condition\n"
>>> " use vhost=on to enable experimental in kernel accelerator\n"
>>> + " (note: vhost=on has no effect unless guest uses MSI-X)\n"
>>> " use 'vhostfd=h' to connect to an already opened vhost net device\n"
>>> #endif
>>> "-net socket[,vlan=n][,name=str][,fd=h][,listen=[host]:port][,connect=host:port]\n"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 15:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost: force vhost off for non-MSI guests Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-20 15:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 16:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-21 0:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-21 1:35 ` Alex Williamson
2011-01-21 9:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-21 13:19 ` Alex Williamson
2011-01-21 13:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-21 14:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-21 9:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-21 14:37 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-01-20 16:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Sridhar Samudrala
2011-01-20 17:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-20 23:43 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2011-01-20 18:05 ` Alex Williamson
2011-03-09 12:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " rukhsana ansari
2011-03-14 17:05 ` rukhsana ansari
2011-03-14 19:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-14 19:31 ` Alex Williamson
2011-03-17 15:34 ` rukhsana ansari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D399A44.5060405@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).