From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38866 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ph9LW-0000pW-W1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:27:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph9LV-00028Q-T6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:27:46 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:64004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ph9LV-00028M-PC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:27:45 -0500 Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so1262881gye.4 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:27:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D3CB968.30604@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:27:36 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] Fast Virtual Disk (FVD) Proposal Part 1 References: <1295474688-6219-1-git-send-email-ctang@us.ibm.com> <4D3A0B7C.3000007@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Chunqiang Tang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/21/2011 08:51 PM, Chunqiang Tang wrote: >>> -void qemu_bh_schedule(QEMUBH *bh) >>> -{ >>> - bh->cb(bh->opaque); >>> -} >>> - >>> -void qemu_bh_cancel(QEMUBH *bh) >>> -{ >>> -} >>> - >>> -void qemu_bh_delete(QEMUBH *bh) >>> -{ >>> - qemu_free(bh); >>> -} >>> - >>> int qemu_set_fd_handler2(int fd, >>> IOCanReadHandler *fd_read_poll, >>> IOHandler *fd_read, >>> >>> >> These functions surely cannot just be deleted like this. >> > These functions were not deleted but instead moved into a separate file > qemu-tool-time.c, because those functions are time related and the > implementations are different in the simulation mode and in the real mode. > In the latest patches, these functions are kept in qemu-tool.c but their > implementations support both cases based on a switch. > I think the root of the problem is that your series didn't maintain bisectability. IOW, each patch needs to be able to be applied one at a time such that at each point, the build doesn't break and functionality doesn't break. Otherwise, tools like git bisect don't work. Regards, Anthony Liguori