From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47345 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PhJcL-0004kd-Om for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:25:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhJaW-0003Ji-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:23:57 -0500 Received: from eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.119]:46676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhJaW-0003JX-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:23:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4D3D5308.3010101@st.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:23:04 +0100 From: Christophe Lyon MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ARM] Contributing tests for Neon References: <4D395ACD.8060606@st.com> <20110122142449.GD21090@laped.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110122142449.GD21090@laped.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Cc: Peter Maydell , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" >> How about you make it available somewhere (tarball via http, git >> repository on gitorious, or other method of your choice) for the >> moment? Then we can take a look at it and proceed from there. > > I agree, this is a good first step. If possible, its good if you > can publish source and binaries so people with the appropriate > tools can rebuild the tests. Also, when possible, binaries with > debug info can be helpful when analyzing test failures. > OK, I am going to have a look at gitorious. In the mean time, I have a bit of cleanup and minimal documentation to perform. Christophe.