From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38914 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PhlDc-0007Q5-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:54:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhlDa-0004Ye-I1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:54:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhlDa-0004YS-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:54:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4D3EF272.7060204@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:55:30 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.14.0 release schedule References: <4D3EE7D9.6030002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D3EF0E2.9030601@aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <4D3EF0E2.9030601@aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel Am 25.01.2011 16:48, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > Anthony Liguori a =E9crit : >> Here's my proposal: >> >> Stable branch - 2/1 >> >> 1 or 2 -rcs in between >> >> Stable release - 2/15 >> >=20 > It looks fine to me. The important is more probably to have a schedule > than the schedule itself. Right, I agree. The schedule is fine with me, too. Kevin