From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50956 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiP0p-0003Ox-0r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:23:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PiP0n-0000So-24
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:23:33 -0500
Received: from mail-px0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:50864)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PiP0m-0000Sh-SM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:23:33 -0500
Received: by pxi16 with SMTP id 16so270459pxi.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D41479D.4060809@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:23:25 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review
	using Rietveld
References: <4D4124F2.7060407@gnu.org>
	<20110127101848.GC19191@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20110127101848.GC19191@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 01/27/2011 11:19 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:55:30AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list.  Since patchwork isn't
>> more than a mail archive the way it's implemented in QEMU, this may
>> be a more interesting possibility.
>
> What features are you looking for beyond archiving?

Well, you pretty much nailed it.

> It would be nice to have a dashboard of currently unapplied patches
> (with old versions of patch series ignored).

and this:

> BTW the email integration sounds good and is critical.

:)

The only tricky point is whether email integration includes ignoring 
older versions of patch series.  I'll ask on gcc@gcc.gnu.org how/whether 
that works.

Paolo