From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35120 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiqRe-0007H7-BV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:41:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1PiqRZ-0006qP-V9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:41:06 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19574)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1PiqRZ-0006qD-NJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:41:01 -0500
Message-ID: <4D42E37B.9010207@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:40:43 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept
	FT migration incoming mode.
References: <1296199312-26334-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>	<1296199312-26334-20-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>	<4D42BD7D.8020004@redhat.com>	<AANLkTi=Q0R8fcL5M-wdLfoA_6Fwx4QX4mj5sLgSrHCo6@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42D601.9010905@redhat.com>	<AANLkTik5tt+o_Sp67TpGw9AZNyMpjK-vyn1VO+SVKo0z@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42DC5E.8060203@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTimaAqcFipREj+XOdprfoL=Sy_nu=_=cjbjJZFD2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimaAqcFipREj+XOdprfoL=Sy_nu=_=cjbjJZFD2@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com

On 01/28/2011 04:31 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> That's the hack I was imaging:)

So your original patch is also a hack? :)

> Maybe this is just an issue of preference, but I'm not sure
> adding "kemari:" to be intuitive.  If there were similar
> extensions having the same problem, I would have agreed quickly.
> I originally didn't have this idea, but simply adding -kemari
> separate from -incoming isn't enough?

No idea...  Only, having "migrate" on one side and something other than 
"-incoming" on the other side seems strange.

Paolo