From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44238 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkFX4-00023P-DF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:40:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PkFX3-0004Im-GO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:40:30 -0500
Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:51287)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PkFX3-0004Ic-Cq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:40:29 -0500
Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so2728778gye.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D47FF39.7060700@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:40:25 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m3hbcpgzm0.fsf@trasno.org> <4D46FB28.9040801@siemens.com>
	<4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 1
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, quintela@redhat.com

On 01/31/2011 10:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested incovering.
>>>
>> o KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination
>
> o QMP support status for 0.14. Luiz and I already chatted about it today
> but would be good to discuss in the call just to see if anyone has
> opinions. Basically, declare it fully supported with a few minor caveats
> (like human-monitor-passthrough is no more supported than the actual
> monitor and recommendations about how to deal with devices in the device
> tree).
>
> Reminder: tomorrow is 0.14 stable fork.

Then I may add to the topics: pings of already-posted 0.14 patches. :)

Paolo