From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59500 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkyQK-0007o1-3k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:36:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkyQG-00056b-CT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:36:30 -0500 Received: from mail-gw0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:55518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkyQG-00056P-8z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:36:28 -0500 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so496090gwa.4 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:36:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D4AA144.3070005@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:36:20 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110201155414.GF28968@x200.localdomain> <4D48367D.2060802@siemens.com> <20110201175336.GA22653@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20110201175336.GA22653@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Chris Wright , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 02/01/2011 06:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way > before starting massive revamping like the glib main loop. Yes, the glib main loop is not going to go anywhere if it cannot be applied to both qemu and qemu-kvm. (And, I believe a new main loop is a necessary condition to show that glib is bringing benefits. It's basically impossible to interface with external libraries as long as we have our own main loop). Paolo