From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49724 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl0Ju-0005sB-Co for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:38:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl0Jo-0005d7-5t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:38:02 -0500 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:30984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl0Jn-0005cK-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:37:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4D4ABDBF.2040505@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:37:51 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] checkpatch.pl complains about untouched tab'ed lines List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Cc: Blue Swirl Hi, just a note, I can't look into this ATM: I get complaints from checkpatch when my patch includes lines with tabs only in the hunk's untouched context. Maybe someone feels like fixing this. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux