From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC: 0/2] patch for QEMU HPET periodic timer emulation to alleviate time drift
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:57:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D500872.3070506@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5007B9.7060806@codemonkey.ws>
On 2011-02-07 15:54, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 08:43 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-02-07 15:28, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/07/2011 08:10 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Again: please not in an ad-hoc fashion but as a generic services usable
>>>> by _all_ periodic timer sources that want to implement compensation.
>>>> This infrastructure should also be designed to once integrate IRQ
>>>> coalescing information as well.
>>>>
>>>> The point why I'm insisting on a broader solution is that both sources
>>>> for lost ticks (iothread and vcpu) end up in the same output: an
>>>> adjustment of the injection frequency of the affected timer device.
>>>> There is not "HPET" or "RTC" or "PIT" in this, all this may apply to the
>>>> SoC timer of some emulated ARM board as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Fair enough, how about:
>>>
>>> typedef struct PeriodicTimer PeriodicTimer;
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * @accumulated_ticks: the number of unacknowledged ticks in total
>>> since the creation of the timer
>>> **/
>>> typedef void (PeriodicTimer)(void *opaque, int accumulated_ticks);
>>>
>> I guess you mean PeriodicTimerFunc.
>
> Yes.
>
>> Why the accumulated_ticks argument?
>>
>
> Then the missing ticks is stored in the PeriodicTimer instead of storing
> it in the device state. That means we won't forget to save it in vmstate.
There should rather be a special vmstate struct for PeriodicTimer, just
like we already have for normal timers.
>
> It's convenient because then if we lose ticks in the PeriodicTimer
> layer, the devices have instance access to that info. When you do a
> read() from timerfd, it returns the number of coalesced events. That's
> the interface I had in my mind.
>
> We could just add a getter for PeriodicTimer and it would serve the same
> purpose.
I'm still not sure what the device model is supposed to do with that
information. I think at could remain private to the PeriodicTimer
implementation (unless we want to dump some stats or such).
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-07 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <480481933.225059.1296734409954.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1375835067.226263.1296740625327.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2011-02-03 15:28 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC: 0/2] patch for QEMU HPET periodic timer emulation to alleviate time drift Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 20:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-03 21:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-04 2:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 8:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 12:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 13:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 13:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:41 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-07 13:46 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-07 13:51 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 13:54 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-07 14:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 14:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 14:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 14:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 14:57 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-02-07 15:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 15:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:13 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 19:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-08 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 19:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 14:58 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-07 15:18 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-04 9:52 ` Ulrich Obergfell
2011-02-07 10:44 ` Ulrich Obergfell
2011-02-07 13:24 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D500872.3070506@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).