From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49538 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmid7-0001ww-Js for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:08:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmid6-0007I8-Pu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:08:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmid6-0007I2-Gy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:08:56 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5369485wwi.10 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:08:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D50FA14.5010100@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:08:52 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D3DFD20.8060004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110125091741.GB30239@edde.se.axis.com> <20110125133453.GC5427@amt.cnet> <20110207101255.GA20413@amt.cnet> <20110207160350.GA26332@amt.cnet> <4D501C71.7090708@redhat.com> <4D50279B.5010102@siemens.com> <4D505DCB.9050406@codemonkey.ws> <20110207214551.GB16429@hall.aurel32.net> <4D50A5F0.802@codemonkey.ws> <20110208072657.GD16429@hall.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <20110208072657.GD16429@hall.aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/7] Enable I/O thread and VNC threads by default List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Anthony Liguori , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jan Kiszka , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , Paul Brook , Arun Bharadwaj , "Edgar E. Iglesias" On 02/08/2011 08:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I forget to remember when we decided that AIO should be implemented on > any host OS. Any pointer? To be fair, I/O-heavy workloads are almost unusable without AIO. For Window targets, they also crash under SMP due to the Windows AP watchdog. But then TCG and SMP do not go very well together anyway. However, I think deprecating Win32 support would be a very bad idea. Paolo