From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36401 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmks6-0005MT-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:32:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmks5-0006Fb-IH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:32:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmks5-0006FX-AS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:32:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4D511B9E.7060205@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:31:58 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/7] Enable I/O thread and VNC threads by default References: <4D3DFD20.8060004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110125091741.GB30239@edde.se.axis.com> <20110125133453.GC5427@amt.cnet> <20110207101255.GA20413@amt.cnet> <20110207160350.GA26332@amt.cnet> <4D501C71.7090708@redhat.com> <4D50279B.5010102@siemens.com> <4D505DCB.9050406@codemonkey.ws> <20110207214551.GB16429@hall.aurel32.net> <4D50A5F0.802@codemonkey.ws> <20110208072657.GD16429@hall.aurel32.net> <4D50FA14.5010100@redhat.com> <4D5103E8.6050808@siemens.com> <4D510771.3040309@aurel32.net> <4D511221.9030505@siemens.com> <4D5113D3.9090802@aurel32.net> <4D511500.1040303@siemens.com> <4D5115C2.6060008@aurel32.net> <4D511AAF.7040202@aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <4D511AAF.7040202@aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Anthony Liguori , Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefan Hajnoczi , Marcelo Tosatti , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Anthony Liguori , Paul Brook , Jan Kiszka , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Arun Bharadwaj On 02/08/2011 11:27 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Stefan Hajnoczi a =E9crit : >> Introducing IOTHREAD made !CONFIG_IOTHREAD platforms second class >> citizens. I think you'd like people to provide full support when they >> introduce new features. > > I think you really pointed the problem here. We should probably add a > feature that will make KVM second class citizen so that people can > understand what it means. I actually don't think introducing IOTHREAD made Windows a second class=20 citizen, since it was left as a non-default choice for years. People=20 care about IOTHREAD now only because (after years) there is serious=20 thought about making it the default. I'm sure that if you add such a killer feature that is TCG-only, KVM=20 people will try to support it in a shorter timeframe. Paolo