From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42093 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Po1Sk-00036u-HU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:27:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ak@linux.intel.com>) id 1Po1Si-0003WT-TH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:27:37 -0500
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:30470)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ak@linux.intel.com>) id 1Po1Si-0003WC-NG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:27:36 -0500
Message-ID: <4D55B7D2.6010206@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:27:30 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu user x86 working?
References: <20110211194953.GA19467@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
	<AANLkTikKDNRGiBU+7RonvaQ09qv9_p=GFdGvP30be3Zf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikKDNRGiBU+7RonvaQ09qv9_p=GFdGvP30be3Zf@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


> I don't have any problems running a statically linked x86_64
> helloworld program in an i386 chroot. Dynamically linked programs try
> to use wrong libraries, but at least running
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 directly works.

static binary segfaults too. I wonder if it's some setup on my system.

I tried disabling the usual suspects like address randomization, but 
that didn't change things.
Or could it be the compiler (gcc 4.5)?

I remember using this quite some time ago (years).

-Andi