From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36152 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pouyw-0004iU-TW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:44:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Pouys-00086O-ER
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:44:34 -0500
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:47695)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Pouys-00086K-5P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:44:30 -0500
Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4373334wwi.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 01:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D58F979.8000508@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:44:25 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Feb 8
References: <AANLkTimtswr5fN9PGVnTSxb9szu12bTC0s4tVwbku-J5@mail.gmail.com>	<4D52F20A.7070009@codemonkey.ws>	<AANLkTi=JzM21XfDR+YO9JY=e8ONGDWVR6YeYdQ7jzzrk@mail.gmail.com>	<4D539800.3070802@codemonkey.ws>
	<20110210090748.GD673@redhat.com>	<4D53BD22.1040800@redhat.com>
	<20110210111354.GA21681@redhat.com>	<4D53DF42.4030700@codemonkey.ws>
	<20110210132730.GB24525@redhat.com>	<4D53F06C.9090500@codemonkey.ws>
	<20110210142044.GD24525@redhat.com>	<4D540CC5.2@codemonkey.ws>	<AANLkTinQDLT1pLv6NEU+_PYaE-uXMn9vdBKjBo3tU9E0@mail.gmail.com>	<4D57F96B.7010004@codemonkey.ws>
	<AANLkTi=+S_HARXj3MzsB4QiuYoPvjN7w_GrO=p4F5sV-@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D583793.10409@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4D583793.10409@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On 02/13/2011 08:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> It shouldn't be able to dead lock if the locking is designed right.

As an aside, one advantage of the qemuthread wrappers is that we can add 
lockdep mechanisms.  (It's true that these could be added to glib as 
well, but getting stuff into glib is a pain).

Paolo