qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH stable] correctly check ppr priority during interrupt injection]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:20:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D59809B.8080101@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110207141444.GH14984@redhat.com>

On 02/07/2011 08:14 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> TPR blocks all interrupts in a priority class, so simple "less or
> equal" check is not enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov<gleb@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>    

Applied.  Thanks.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> diff --git a/hw/apic.c b/hw/apic.c
> index 2f8376a..218d1bb 100644
> --- a/hw/apic.c
> +++ b/hw/apic.c
> @@ -372,19 +372,36 @@ static int apic_get_arb_pri(APICState *s)
>       return 0;
>   }
>
> -/* signal the CPU if an irq is pending */
> -static void apic_update_irq(APICState *s)
> +
> +/*
> + *<0 - low prio interrupt,
> + * 0  - no interrupt,
> + *>0 - interrupt number
> + */
> +static int apic_irq_pending(APICState *s)
>   {
>       int irrv, ppr;
> -    if (!(s->spurious_vec&  APIC_SV_ENABLE))
> -        return;
>       irrv = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
> -    if (irrv<  0)
> -        return;
> +    if (irrv<  0) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
>       ppr = apic_get_ppr(s);
> -    if (ppr&&  (irrv&  0xf0)<= (ppr&  0xf0))
> +    if (ppr&&  (irrv&  0xf0)<= (ppr&  0xf0)) {
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    return irrv;
> +}
> +
> +/* signal the CPU if an irq is pending */
> +static void apic_update_irq(APICState *s)
> +{
> +    if (!(s->spurious_vec&  APIC_SV_ENABLE)) {
>           return;
> -    cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> +    }
> +    if (apic_irq_pending(s)>  0) {
> +        cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> +    }
>   }
>
>   void apic_reset_irq_delivered(void)
> @@ -590,12 +607,13 @@ int apic_get_interrupt(DeviceState *d)
>       if (!(s->spurious_vec&  APIC_SV_ENABLE))
>           return -1;
>
> -    /* XXX: spurious IRQ handling */
> -    intno = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
> -    if (intno<  0)
> +    intno = apic_irq_pending(s);
> +
> +    if (intno == 0) {
>           return -1;
> -    if (s->tpr&&  intno<= s->tpr)
> +    } else if (intno<  0) {
>           return s->spurious_vec&  0xff;
> +    }
>       reset_bit(s->irr, intno);
>       set_bit(s->isr, intno);
>       apic_update_irq(s);
> --
> 			Gleb.
>
>
>    

      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-14 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07 14:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH stable] correctly check ppr priority during interrupt injection] Gleb Natapov
2011-02-14 19:20 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D59809B.8080101@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).