From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH stable] correctly check ppr priority during interrupt injection]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:20:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D59809B.8080101@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110207141444.GH14984@redhat.com>
On 02/07/2011 08:14 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> TPR blocks all interrupts in a priority class, so simple "less or
> equal" check is not enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov<gleb@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> diff --git a/hw/apic.c b/hw/apic.c
> index 2f8376a..218d1bb 100644
> --- a/hw/apic.c
> +++ b/hw/apic.c
> @@ -372,19 +372,36 @@ static int apic_get_arb_pri(APICState *s)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* signal the CPU if an irq is pending */
> -static void apic_update_irq(APICState *s)
> +
> +/*
> + *<0 - low prio interrupt,
> + * 0 - no interrupt,
> + *>0 - interrupt number
> + */
> +static int apic_irq_pending(APICState *s)
> {
> int irrv, ppr;
> - if (!(s->spurious_vec& APIC_SV_ENABLE))
> - return;
> irrv = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
> - if (irrv< 0)
> - return;
> + if (irrv< 0) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> ppr = apic_get_ppr(s);
> - if (ppr&& (irrv& 0xf0)<= (ppr& 0xf0))
> + if (ppr&& (irrv& 0xf0)<= (ppr& 0xf0)) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return irrv;
> +}
> +
> +/* signal the CPU if an irq is pending */
> +static void apic_update_irq(APICState *s)
> +{
> + if (!(s->spurious_vec& APIC_SV_ENABLE)) {
> return;
> - cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> + }
> + if (apic_irq_pending(s)> 0) {
> + cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> + }
> }
>
> void apic_reset_irq_delivered(void)
> @@ -590,12 +607,13 @@ int apic_get_interrupt(DeviceState *d)
> if (!(s->spurious_vec& APIC_SV_ENABLE))
> return -1;
>
> - /* XXX: spurious IRQ handling */
> - intno = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
> - if (intno< 0)
> + intno = apic_irq_pending(s);
> +
> + if (intno == 0) {
> return -1;
> - if (s->tpr&& intno<= s->tpr)
> + } else if (intno< 0) {
> return s->spurious_vec& 0xff;
> + }
> reset_bit(s->irr, intno);
> set_bit(s->isr, intno);
> apic_update_irq(s);
> --
> Gleb.
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-14 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 14:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH stable] correctly check ppr priority during interrupt injection] Gleb Natapov
2011-02-14 19:20 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D59809B.8080101@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).