Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] iohandlers: Mark current implementation as 'old'

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 02/22/2011 01:17 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Tue) 22 Feb 2011 [13:09:34], Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  On 02/22/2011 12:18 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >  >Mark the current iohandler list as 'old'.  In the next commit we'll
> >  >introduce a new iohandler api that will replace the list name.
> >  >
> >  >The 'old' list will eventually be completely replaced by the new
> >  >implementation.
> >
> >  A better way to do this is to implement the old API in terms of the
> >  new API.  This ensures you don't lose any functionality, and reduces
> >  the amount of low-level infrastructure.
>
> With this new approach of switching to just one callback, that is more
> work for little gain as we'll just deprecate the older API soon.  (The
> previous patches used this approach, btw.)

Does "deprecate" mean "completely remove"?

If so I agree.

> Would you still prefer to have an old->new mapping?
>

If you don't remove the old API, yes.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function