From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59551 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsHe9-0002E3-VN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:33:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsHe8-000661-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:33:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsHe8-00065t-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:33:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4D6536B8.3030508@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:32:56 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1298278286-9158-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20110223101806.GA27880@edde.se.axis.com> <4D64E0B2.3050900@redhat.com> <20110223110850.GB27880@edde.se.axis.com> <4D6500D3.40205@redhat.com> <20110223162738.GD27880@edde.se.axis.com> In-Reply-To: <20110223162738.GD27880@edde.se.axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve -icount, fix it with iothread List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Cc: Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/23/2011 05:27 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > For the "almost deadlock" testcase, I think the CRIS image on the > wiki is OK. Ah yes, I was understanding that the watchdog itself slowed down too and didn't trigger. So I was indeed seeing it (and not patient enough to see it boot). > Still slower than non iothread builds though. In particular if you > compare icount 10, with and without iothread. Very good, thanks. I'll look at it after this series is in, and Jan's optimization patch as well hopefully. Paolo