From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: quintela@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Split machine creation from the main loop
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:12:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D65945A.3090106@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d3mi2w76.fsf@trasno.org>
On 02/23/2011 05:00 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Anthony Liguori<aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> The goal is to enable the monitor to run independently of whether the machine
>> has been created such that the monitor can be used to specify all of the
>> parameters for machine initialization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori<aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>>
> I agree that it is one step in the right direction, but we are still
> calling qemu_machine_init() before calling the main_loop().
>
> What is the plan from here?
>
1) Decouple QMP from qemu_machine_init(). This really requires the
introduction of the new QAPI server that exists outside of the chardev
infrastructure since chardevs are currently initialized in
qemu_machine_init().
2) Make qemu_machine_init() take no parameters and just reference global
state.
3) Teach all QMP functions to behave themselves if called before
qemu_machine_init()
4) Introduce QMP function to call qemu_machine_init()
5) Introduce new command line flag to not automatically call
qemu_machine_init()
6) Convert all command line options to just be QMP function calls
(6) can be started right now. (1) comes with the QAPI merge. (2) is
pretty easy to do after applying this patch. (3) is probably something
that can be done shortly after (1). (4) and (5) really require
everything but (6) to be in place before we can meaningful do it.
I think we can lay out much of the ground work for this in 0.15 and I
think we can have a total conversion realistically for 0.16. That means
that by EOY, we could invoke QEMU with no options and do everything
through QMP.
Somewhere in all of this, we need to fit in a stateful (non-)config file
too IMHO.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Later, Juan.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 21:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Split machine creation from the main loop Anthony Liguori
2011-02-23 23:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2011-02-23 23:12 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-02-23 23:38 ` Juan Quintela
2011-02-24 0:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-24 10:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-02-24 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-24 16:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 17:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-27 11:33 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-28 4:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-28 8:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-28 9:13 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-28 10:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-02-28 12:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-02-25 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D65945A.3090106@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).