From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38770 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PujbA-0006rf-MC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:48:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1Pujb9-0006g4-EL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:48:04 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52125)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1Pujb9-0006fu-3h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:48:03 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6E2059.8040603@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:47:53 +0100
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality
	vs	supportive features
References: <4D6BD085.8000001@redhat.com>	<AANLkTik-9oDv2UyRzVQQtKNumJnVT9pp_0U_5z+A9PSv@mail.gmail.com>	<4D6CE170.6060108@redhat.com>	<AANLkTin8qCDOjFQZ_heMc9fYqDBa+ErjtyzXYcRuXhgU@mail.gmail.com>	<4D6D01E2.1070908@redhat.com>
	<4D6E1BE5.5070306@redhat.com> <4D6E1F14.5050302@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D6E1F14.5050302@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: dlaor@redhat.com
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>

On 03/02/11 11:42, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 12:28 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 03/01/11 15:25, Dor Laor wrote:
>>> I agree it is desirable to the this for spice but it is allot more
>>> complex than virtagent isolation. Spice is performance sensitive and
>>> contains much more state. It needs to access the guest memory for
>>> reading the surfaces. It can be solved but needs some major changes.
>>> Adding spice-devel to the discussion.
>>
>> Please don't add broken misconfigured mailing lists, which require
>> moderator or subscription, to discussions on public lists.
> 
> Isn't it simpler to ask the spice list maintainer (Alon Levy, CCed) to
> do it?

We cannot have a discussion on a mailing list if we constantly have to
wait for the list maintainer to approve it. There is really zero
justification for closing a development list of an open source project.
Spam is handled in other ways, this doesn't solve it.

Cheers,
Jes