From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41929 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwitZ-00048S-OH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:27:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PwitY-0002d3-KR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:27:17 -0500
Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:37368)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PwitY-0002cm-Df
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:27:16 -0500
Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so2218572yxk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D755BBE.1000100@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:27:10 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AANLkTint9-P-1jD5pbXstzPcYueLHQ68Rd0T_Chz6xRN@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D68F20D.2020401@web.de> <20110305163558.GA4607@amt.cnet>
	<4D736434.1030704@redhat.com> <20110307161305.GB10021@amt.cnet>
In-Reply-To: <20110307161305.GB10021@amt.cnet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, xming <xmingske@gmail.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

On 03/07/2011 05:13 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Is write access to memory map necessary from vcpu context?

At least in x86 world SMM is entered from vcpu context, so I guess yes.

Paolo