From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47341 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px0FG-0003rQ-6U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:58:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px0FD-00038b-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:58:48 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:49844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px0FD-00038I-DR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:58:47 -0500 Received: by ywl41 with SMTP id 41so2573581ywl.4 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:58:46 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:58:39 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 03/08/2011 05:51 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> > iothread merge? >> > - progressing slowly, marcelo working on it >> > - have found regressions (signal handling code) (ifdef'd away for now) > The regressions will automagically go away (to be replaced with others > then...) when the switch of qemu-kvm to upstream bits is performed. They > were related to qemu-kvm implementing iothread on top of non-threaded > qemu and /me not looking careful enough on the implications. The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? (Sorry, not on the call today). Paolo