From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49442 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px0V2-00057O-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:15:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px0V0-0001fe-Ro for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:15:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px0V0-0001fW-JQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:15:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:15:01 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Chris Wright , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a > > regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? > > Can't follow. What do you mean? I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. Paolo