From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50465 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px0uR-0003d1-Eq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:41:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Px0uQ-0000VU-75
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:41:23 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33763)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Px0uP-0000VH-RO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:41:22 -0500
Message-ID: <4D766A3D.90305@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:41:17 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain>
	<4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com>
	<4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com>
	<4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On 03/08/2011 07:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> >  On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >>>   The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
>> >>>   regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
>> >>
>> >>  Can't follow. What do you mean?
>> >
>> >  I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this 
>> test
>> >  definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu 
>> non-iothread.
>> >    What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.
>
> That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes?  I wasn't talking about 
> that in the call.

Of course, this is an important issue in its own right.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function