From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41524 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxBca-0006q1-MA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:07:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxBcZ-000677-MO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:07:40 -0500 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=50648 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxBcZ-00065z-EX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:07:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4D770A51.6050509@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:04:17 +0800 From: Wen Congyang MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] `qdev_free` when unplug a pci device References: <1298396180-23734-1-git-send-email-wdauchy@gmail.com> <20110223025001.GC19727@valinux.co.jp> <4D6B0DF8.5000407@cn.fujitsu.com> <20110309040814.GM23238@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20110309040814.GM23238@us.ibm.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ryan Harper Cc: Isaku Yamahata , Gerd Hoffmann , Markus Armbruster , William Dauchy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org At 03/09/2011 12:08 PM, Ryan Harper Write: > * Wen Congyang [2011-02-27 20:56]: >> Hi Markus Armbruster >> >> At 02/23/2011 04:30 PM, Markus Armbruster Write: >>> Isaku Yamahata writes: >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> I don't think this patch is correct. Let me explain. >>> >>> Device hot unplug is *not* guaranteed to succeed. >>> >>> For some buses, such as USB, it always succeeds immediately, i.e. when >>> the device_del monitor command finishes, the device is gone. Live is >>> good. >>> >>> But for PCI, device_del merely initiates the ACPI unplug rain dance. It >>> doesn't wait for the dance to complete. Why? The dance can take an >>> unpredictable amount of time, including forever. >>> >>> Problem: Subsequent device_add can fail if it reuses the qdev ID or PCI >>> slot, and the unplug has not yet completed (race condition), or it >>> failed. Yes, Virginia, PCI hotplug *can* fail. >>> >>> When unplug succeeds, the qdev is automatically destroyed. >>> pciej_write() does that for PIIX4. Looks like pcie_cap_slot_event() >>> does it for PCIE. >> >> I got a similar problem. When I unplug a pci device by hand, it works >> as expected, and I can hotplug it again. But when I use a srcipt to >> do the same thing, sometimes it failed. I think I may find another bug. >> >> Steps to reproduce this bug: >> 1. cat ./test-e1000.sh # RHEL6RC is domain name >> #! /bin/bash >> >> while true; do >> virsh attach-interface RHEL6RC network default --mac 52:54:00:1f:db:c7 --model e1000 >> if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then >> break >> fi >> virsh detach-interface RHEL6RC network --mac 52:54:00:1f:db:c7 >> if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then >> break >> fi >> sleep 5 > > How do you know that the guest has responded at this point before you > attempt to attach again at the top of the loop. Any attach/detach > requires the guest to respond to the request and it may not respond at > all. When I attach/detach interface by hand, it works fine: I can see the new interface when I attach it, and it disapears when I detached it. > >