From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43105 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxF1O-0004ws-MD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:45:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxF1N-00020G-Ae for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:45:30 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxF1N-0001zz-1d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:45:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4D773E9F.6060009@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:47:27 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] lsi53c895a: add support for ABORT messages References: <1283784174-30436-1-git-send-email-bernhard.kohl@nsn.com> <4CADAE8E.2050405@redhat.com> <34941DDA-4ADD-478F-A529-2B48F4A64541@dlh.net> In-Reply-To: <34941DDA-4ADD-478F-A529-2B48F4A64541@dlh.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven Cc: Bernhard Kohl , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Hannes Reinecke Am 09.03.2011 00:04, schrieb Peter Lieven: > > Am 07.10.2010 um 13:27 schrieb Kevin Wolf: > >> Am 06.09.2010 16:42, schrieb Bernhard Kohl: >>> If these messages are not handled correctly the guest driver may hang. >>> >>> Always mandatory: >>> - ABORT >>> - BUS DEVICE RESET >>> >>> Mandatory if tagged queuing is implemented (which disks usually do): >>> - ABORT TAG >>> - CLEAR QUEUE >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kohl >> >> Nicholas, as you seem to have touched the lsi code recently, care to >> review this one? Assuming that you are reasonably familiar with both the >> hardware and the code, you should be quicker than me with this. > > Is there a reason why this patch was never added to the stable qemu-kvm release? > At least int qemu-kvm-0.14.0 I still can't find it. The reason is that it still didn't get a review. Kevin